Time-aware Traffic Shaper using Time-based Packet Scheduling on Intel I210

  • Syed Sahal Nazli Alhady School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Wan Amir Fuad Wajdi Othman School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Aeizaal Azman Abd Wahab School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Aeizaal Azman Abd Wahab School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Por Yin Wong School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Abstract

By 2015, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) time-sensitive networking (TSN) task group has released several TSN standards. Amongst them is 802.1Qbv, also known as a time-aware shaper, aiming to provide performance assurances of latency and delivery variation to enable applications in a TSN network. While there are several products and evaluation kits that employ 802.1Qbv in the market now, it is still not widely adopted yet due to the maturity of the standard. Hardware-enabled 802.1Qbv use hardware queues and timers to achieve accurate transmission of packets in the switch and bridge. This research aims to investigate the feasibility of using an existing end-station Ethernet controller, Intel I210, and its launch time control feature (commonly known as time-based packet scheduling) to shape traffic compatible to 802.1Qbv-enabled network bridges. A software solution is developed by implementing a software configurable gate-control list and employing open-source Linux RFC patches for per-packet transmit time specification. By configuring the kernel and mapping kernel-layer traffic classes to the hardware queues, packets can be transmitted out at precise times while attaching 802.1Q VLAN tags, required by bridges to identify packets. Through analysis, it is found that this solution will require an additional 30 μs transmit offset to be used effectively. That is 55% more time is needed to transmit a packet in a back-to-back connection and 17.6% on a 3-switch network to improve period peak jitter performance to just 8.9  μs compared to 1 ms on solutions that send packets out periodically using software sleep functions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. Morton, B. C. (2009, March). Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement. Retrieved July 2018, from https://ietf.org/rfc/rfc5481.txt
[2] Bello, L. L. (2014). Novel trends in automotive networks: A perspective on Ethernet and the IEEE Audio Video Bridging. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA). Barcelona.
[3] Cochran, R. (2018, April). Linuxptp. Retrieved May 2018, from https://github.com/richardcochran/linuxptp
[4] Corbet, J. (2018, March). Time-based packet transmission. ( Eklektix, Inc) Retrieved May 2018, from https://lwn.net/Articles/748879/
[5] Decotignie, J. D. (June 2005). Ethernet-Based Real-Time and Industrial Communications. IEEE, vol. 93( no. 6), pp. 1102-1117.
[6] IEEE. (March 18 2016). "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks -- Bridges and Bridged Networks - Amendment 25: Enhancements for Scheduled Traffic" in IEEE 802.1Qbv-2015. New York: IEEE Standards Association.
[7] Kyung Chang Lee, S. L. (2002). Performance evaluation of switched Ethernet for real-time industrial communications. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 24(5), 441-423.
[8] P. Meyer, T. S. (2013). Extending IEEE 802.1 AVB with time-triggered scheduling: A simulation study of the coexistence of synchronous and asynchronous traffic. IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference, , (pp. pp. 47-54.). Boston, MA, 2013, .
[9] Tranchemontagne, M. (2016, June). Jitter Basics, Advanced, and Noise Analysis. Retrieved July 2018, from https://www.ieee.li/pdf/viewgraphs/jitter_basics_advanced.pdf
Published
2018-11-06
How to Cite
ALHADY, Syed Sahal Nazli et al. Time-aware Traffic Shaper using Time-based Packet Scheduling on Intel I210. International Journal of Research and Engineering, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 9, p. 494-499, nov. 2018. ISSN 2348-7860. Available at: <https://digital.ijre.org/index.php/int_j_res_eng/article/view/356>. Date accessed: 11 dec. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.21276/ijre.2018.5.9.1.